Blogosfera Navas & Cusí

Our law firm Navas & Cusí with offices in Madrid and Barcelona has a multidisciplinary character and with an international vocation (based in Brussels), specializes in banking, financial and commercial law.
Contact us
To guarantee quality and personalized attention, we serve by prior appointment in person or by video conference. We don't work for results.

The Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 establishes rules

“to ensure that anyone who has suffered harm caused by an infringement of competition law by an undertaking or by an association of undertakings can effectively exercise the right to claim full compensation for that harm” (article 1)

In order to prevent practices which may affect trade between Member States and prevent, restrict or distort competition within the internal market and practices and abusive exploitation by one or more undertakings of a dominant position in the internal market or in an important part of it (articles 101 and 102 TFEU).

Right to full compensation for the harm

In effect, anyone (consumers, undertakings and public authorities) who has suffered damage as a result of such infringements may claim compensation for the actual loss, loss of profit and interest from the time the damage occurred until when the compensation is paid.

In particular, the actual loss can be the difference between the amount of money already paid and the amount that would have been paid if no infringement had been committed.

The right to full compensation can be brought not only by those who have who have purchased goods or services from the infringer, but also by further buyers in the supply chain.

Evidence and quantification of harm

It is true that the evidence will be an important element in the action for damages for infringement of Union or national competition law. For this reason, the Directive 2014/104/EU provides that Member States shall ensure that

national courts are able, upon request of the defendant, to order the claimant or a third party to disclose relevant evidence” (article 5)

Provided that the viability of the action for damages is sufficiently justified.

Member States shall ensure that the national courts are empowered, in accordance with national procedures, to estimate the amount of harm if it is established that a claimant suffered harm but it is practically impossible or excessively difficult precisely to quantify the harm suffered on the basis of the evidence available.

If, on the basis of the available evidence, national courts find it excessively difficult to quantify the damage, but the claimant has proved that he has suffered it, they are entitled to estimate the amount of this harm.

Limitation periods

It shall be for the member states to determine the time limit for bringing actions for damages, which shall be computed once the infringement has ceased and the plaintiff has or may have had knowledge of:

  • the behaviour and the fact that it constitutes an infringement of competition law;
  • the fact that the infringement of competition law has caused harm to it; and
  • the identity of the infringer.


As lawyers specialized in European Union Law, Navas & Cusí may advise and defend –out-of-court settlements and/or in court- the interests of those people and companies that have been harmed by anti-competitive behaviours.

Navas & Cusí Abogados
Previous post Next post